Skip to main content

As Cost of Living Prices Soar, is Flaunting Untouched Food the Latest Luxury Trend?

by Kinjal Dixit

Food, a universal basic necessity, is increasingly being viewed as a luxury category amid rising costs. 


With prices steadily climbing, the affordability of food is diminishing, echoing historical trend patterns. Unlike fashion trends, however, this shift in food perception has significant economic implications, particularly for the average consumer, raising concerns about affordability and societal implications.


Throughout history, trends tend to resurface, and the current trend of portraying food as a symbol of affluence echoes this pattern. In today’s economy, obvious displays of wealth often involve excessive quantities of food, even when it won’t be consumed. 


Flaunting purely decorative food, particularly in the form of elaborate displays at parties, has become synonymous with the upper class.


Social media magnifies this phenomenon, exemplified by celebrities who flaunt lavish dinner parties featuring untouched spreads meant solely for visual spectacle. 


An Instagram post from Khloé Kardashian furthered this, presenting a bouquet containing oranges despite oranges recently experiencing shortages in the USA. 


Such displays of excess amid scarcity underscore societal disparities and the disconnect between abundance and need.


As food becomes synonymous with wealth and luxury, the inherent wastefulness of these displays becomes increasingly apparent. At events like the Grammys, food is presented more as decor than sustenance, contributing to the normalization of excess and the devaluation of food’s primary function.


Charcuterie boards strategically placed for aesthetic appeal highlight the growing disconnect between food and its primary purpose – nourishment.


Luxury fashion brands capitalize on this trend by incorporating food-related motifs into their designs, further perpetuating the narrative of exclusivity. Louis Vuitton's $3000 sandwich bag and Balenciaga's grocery shopping-themed runway (including a $1800 lays crips bag) showcase blur the lines between everyday necessities and luxury commodities.



As prices soar and accessibility diminishes, food finds its place alongside high-end fashion on runways and in advertising campaigns.


Paired with online Erehwon mukbangs boasting $100 on smoothies and ice cream, mundane tasks like grocery shopping are now portrayed as luxury experiences, reflecting a broader societal shift towards equating food with opulence.


This trend not only reflects widening socioeconomic disparities but also challenges our perception of basic necessities. As the rich flaunt their abundance, the less fortunate struggle to access essential resources, highlighting systemic inequalities.


In a world where basic necessities are rebranded as luxuries, it is imperative to address the root causes of inequality and ensure equitable access to food for all. Only then can we strive towards a society where food is no longer synonymous with privilege, but a fundamental right for every individual.


Edited by Emily Duff

Most Popular

Fashion For a Cause: Brands That Stand with Palestine and the history of fashion as a form of Activism

by Oana-Maria Moldovan For over two months, there has been an ongoing genocide war in Gaza. To simplify a long and horrific issue, the situation that started, on a larger scale, around one hundred years ago, and has only become amplified since October 7th 2023. Taking place around the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, and Israel–Lebanon border, the armed conflict is between Israel and Hamas-led Palestinian militant groups.  The problem is about “stolen” land. Said land is seen as an important holy part of both religions involved. But really, how holy can we consider a land to be, if people kill other people for it? It’s important to remember that this genocide is about three things: forced occupation, zionism, and religion. It’s also important to remember what ethnic erasure is. This terrible expresion, also known as cultural or ethnic assimilation, refers to the process by which the distinct cultural or ethnic identity of a particular group is gradually diminished or erased, often due to...

Now What? The Aftermath of the 'Manic Pixie Dream Girl'

by Susan Moore Here is a bit about me: I am an open, excitable, creative AFAB who is also moderately attractive. I have a unique sense of personal style and a personality that on the surface can only be described as “bubbly” and “quirky”. For this reason, dating is a nightmare. To be sure, I do not have a hard time finding dates or potential suitors. The problems arise when said dates spend some time with me and decide that I am a rare specimen, and the connection they feel with me is “unlike anything they have felt before”. Then, things go one of two ways.  Either a) they decide I am too high maintenance and no longer palatable, or  b) they choose to never look further than the surface and are content to date the idea of me rather than the real me. There is something rather interesting, perhaps funny, about my situation. It is in no way unique. I have met so many people who constantly dealt with the same problem. Even funnier still, is the fact that there is a trope that simu...

Victoria’s Secret's Downfall: Lack of Diversity and the Reimagined Fashion Show That Aims to Save the Brand

by Ally McLaren For 23 years, Victoria's Secret dazzled the world with its extravagant annual Fashion Show, but in 2019, the event was abruptly canceled.  This decision, however, wasn't entirely surprising. The brand had faced mounting criticism for its lack of diversity, which contributed to declining ratings and scandals behind the scenes.  Now, Victoria's Secret is attempting to reinvent itself with a new fashion show concept. Will this be enough to save the brand from its troubled past? The Victoria's Secret Fashion Show was once renowned for its bejeweled bras, angel wings, and A-list performances. Despite thus, its popularity waned due to the brand's refusal to embrace diversity.  Public outcry intensified in 2018 when the show's organizer, Edward Razek, made controversial remarks about not featuring plus-size or transgender models, suggesting it didn't align with the brand's fantasy image.  Moreover, revelations about the brand's former CEO...